You see we are into semantics yet again you apply the science I apply the reality - our perception. This is the problem with science it is our perception as well but people try to elevate it beyond that.Lurcher300b wrote: ↑Fri Nov 10, 2017 5:31 pm "Hot and Cold exist or are we inventing that."
They are just human constructs like left and right, up and down, good and evil. What exists is temperature, as in the rate the atoms are vibrating, there is no negative temperature. In the same way there is mass 1Kg of protons has the same mass as 1kg of anti protons. Everything about an anti proton is the same as a proton apart from its charge and magnetic moment, its not some mystical inverse as you may be imagining. Its just a different collection of quarks. There is no anti mass or anti gravity, or anti temperature. We are not catching up on anything from thousands of years ago, its just the old mystical ideas are becoming popular again and people are trying to give them extra credence by trying to find parallels in science.
Again I ask find me a concept that doesn't have an opposite. I will never turn you into a toaist and you will never turn me into a scientist. I am not interested in theory I am not interested in equation, I am interested in what I observe, my perceptions, I judge everything on that including hi-fi i.e. subjectivist. You dismiss people who explore *their* universe with imagination, as did the people you applaud, they had to imagine a concept or theory if they wanted find it, which is why the concept is first and the proof is last, not the other way around.
It seems even at Cern they have figured this out, they find something and then start looking for its opposite as they know it must exist.