Dr Bunsen Honeydew wrote:There are advocates of the RR series but people it seems don't realise they were the sign of Joe compromising. The process of driver doping and matching was expensive and time consuming and only he knew how to do it. The RRs and the tie up with JPW was to get an easier life and make some money for a change. They don't have the musical magic of earlier Royds but are still very good.
They may be small but I think the best of the bunch is Merlins, best of luck in finding any though.
I think the RR3 does have parts of a speaker that Joe Ackroyd intended to pass on, namely a generically doped driver with a 1st order crossover on it, so the new guys didn't have to hand dope each one with a weird jig that only Joe knew how to use(?).
It also has parts of a speaker where he surpassed all of his previous thinking, and that is in his use of compound reflex loading to massively reduce the phase shift of the low frequencies. Once you've heard RR3s for enough time you start to notice how the bass seems to 'hit' you at the same time as everything else. It also has the usual Royd virtues of being exceptional tuneful, great timbre, not just lumps of 'bass reflex' guff - not that any of his speakers sounded like that though unless pushed too hard.
There is a great feeling of 'everything where it should be' with this speaker. They are also far more sophisticated in the treble than traditional Royds no doubt in part to a) using a higher quality tweeter and b) putting a 1st order crossover back on the it (he used 2nd order in latter-day speakers). They like ultra-wide positioning & still cast a thick soundstage in between the speakers.
They sound like a 'grown up' Royd speaker to me. A masterpiece in optimising a speaker for a UK living room.
Fair enough they don't 'cut through the air' like classic Royds do, definitely a few seats back, but the RR3 is a Royd speaker through-and-through.
They need serious amps, 83db sensitivity is of course very low. I got the best results with my LFD PA2M (SE), if using NVA would definitely want to have A80s. Interestingly on Audiochews they are using 10W or 18W amps, but I suspect what RR3s really need is huge amounts of instantaneous current delivery rather than 'watts'.