Page 2 of 2

Re: Old rocker health issues

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 7:04 am
by CN211276
antonio66 wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 6:34 am I cannot think of one S Wilson remaster we have not liked. Each to his own Jammy. :grin:
Have been playing the Yes and Jethro Tull ones quite a bit recently. Definately better to these ears.

Re: Old rocker health issues

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:56 am
by Jammy Dodger
I'm pleased for the pair o you, knock yerself out on remasters, but I will stick to the originals.
Far better to these ears / each to their own.....etc.

Re: Old rocker health issues

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 11:55 am
by Classicrock
Jammy Dodger wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:56 am I'm pleased for the pair o you, knock yerself out on remasters, but I will stick to the originals.
Far better to these ears / each to their own.....etc.
It depends on a lot of things. If you have to buy originals of some albums it will cost a small fortune. Classic Records did as good a job of all analogue reissues as any label. Analogue productions, Speakers Corner and MFSL still do some great reissues. I would agree with you were people are praising a digital copy pressed to vinyl by Music On Vinyl and most major labels. However not all digital remasters/remixes are bad especially the Steve Wilson Tulls.

Re: Old rocker health issues

Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2019 7:19 pm
by Jammy Dodger
By the way....(for clarification).....I was only talking Vinyl.

If you want to flic yet flac talk to some other nugget.