JAMMY

[Dr Bunsen Honeydew]

Some people have moaned that I don't admin Jammy like everyone else and he gets away with murder (murdering the rules) well yes guilty as charged

BUT Jammy is Jammy if I treated him the same, we wouldn't have a Jammy, and every forum should have a Jammy, life would be so boring without a Jammy. So the answer is note what he says, but not the way he says it, and keep this image of him in your mind.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTMjbkjsL5g

[jammy395]

Doc ........

Don't you think this will only strengthen the brigade that thinks......

Doc = Jammy = DQ = Doc = DQ = Jammy = Doc............etc.

[Dr Bunsen Honeydew]

Well as Taz would say "yahwhagragragle - ferk 'em"

[jammy395]

Cheer's Jammy. All the very best Dan...!!!

[Daniel Quinn]

Only one forum has a jammy. And it is the best. So sod the moaners.

[Dr Bunsen Honeydew]

TAS has a Jammy and a DQ it is only missing a Doc

[slinger]

As long as we make Jammy fair game. If he can call me what he wants without fear of "prosecution" under the ad hominem rule then I get to call him anything I like. Fair?

[Dr Bunsen Honeydew]

Sort of but you should really just ignore our Jammy when he goes off on one, it is part of our entertainment and he does it to me and everyone. I want you to be a Slinger not another Jammy, we already have one

[Stemcor1990]

As a newbie who has read a few of Jammy's posts, let me throw my hat into the ring.

Jammy is funny. His posts make me laugh and are always worth reading. He seems to me to be a bloke who wears his heart on his sleeve, says it as he sees it and knows a bullsh*tter when he sees one. However, I did read the snooker post and understood the outcry. The bottom line is that Jammy should have the right to say what he wants but I think he knows that the book will be thrown at him by several people if he oversteps the mark.

My message to the man is to keep on posting because every item is worth reading.