Hi-Fi Honesty

All general audio posts go here.
Vinyl-ant
Posts: 765
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2017 12:51 pm
Location: South yorkshire
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 363 times
Contact:
Great Britain

Re: Hi-Fi Honesty

Unread post by Vinyl-ant »

I have 2 lencos, the 301, my jvc QL-Y5F (not plastic) and jbe dd, if someone wants to bring a bouncy belt drive deck (i don't have one) round to actually see what the differences are, rather than just believe the hyperbole around them all, be my guest. Personally I just like turntables. I know what I like.
Analogue: oracle delphi sme 309, jbe series 3 cx unipivot dv20x2l, roksan xerxes tabriz vm750, jvc ql-y5f rigb at440, jvc ql-y3f vm750, lenco 75, technics sl150

Phono stages: cole lcr, benedict audio hothead

Digital: cyrus cd7, wiim mini x2, topping e30, jds labs el dac 2+

Amplification: nelson pass b1, nelson pass f5

Speakers: 15" fane aperiodic wardrobes

Cans: myryad z40, hifiman sundara + deva, fostex t50rp, sennheiser momentum on ear +over ear, b&w p5 and p7

_D_S_J_R_
Posts: 4185
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:53 am
Location: The end of the road in Suffolk Coastal.
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 6 times
Wales

Re: Hi-Fi Honesty

Unread post by _D_S_J_R_ »

I'm being pompous, but must disagree with you on the idler decks as I can't stand the background 'drone' I hear in so many compared to the direct drives I've owned, but it's just not worth the energy to do so any more. Apologies for being pompous, but I cannot share my experiences with you only by memories and words, which are as nothing compared with sitting you all down and demonstrating what I'm trying to say. I'll get out now before it deteriorates any further.

By the way, It was an ex-BBC 301 in a modern plinth design that showed the slight 'wow' in an LP12 which I'd never really noticed before. The 301 held pitch like 'digital' does, but this 301 wasn't quiet, or neutral, even if it did funk the tunes up so well...
Hanging on in quiet desperation is the English way...The time has gone, The song is over, Thought I'd something more to say...

Daniel Quinn
Posts: 8586
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:16 am
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 399 times

Re: Hi-Fi Honesty

Unread post by Daniel Quinn »

Dave trouble with your anecdotes from the 70/80/90s
Is they are never filtered through the light of now.

Personally, everything I thought I knew yesterday is subject to revision today.

O yeah. I own an idler.

TroutFisher
Posts: 71
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2018 10:40 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 9 times
Great Britain

Re: Hi-Fi Honesty

Unread post by TroutFisher »

Well, anecdotes from the past can be useful, but regarding idler and direct drive (in the day) they are not helpful because they only relate to how things were in the old days with crappy plinths. It needs to be acknowledged that Garrard and Lenco turntables have had a renaissance because DIYer’s have discovered that sinking the energy these TT’s produce into dense plinths be they slate or wood construction incorporating a CLD approach really does work to stop rumble, wow and flutter. A shame really because this knowledge discovered earlier might have saved these Marques.

After I discovered what a 401 could do in a fat slab of Mahogany, I moved onto slate. I sold the Michell Gyrorb. Although I had no concern about the sound reproduced from my 401, eventually I got fed up with the clunky mechanical mechanism of the 401 and the need to be constantly attentive to the speed control. I appreciated I could buy a improved power supply from LongDog Audio but it didn’t delete clunky. Eventually, buying from abroad, I invested in a Denon DP-80. I sunk this into a dense CLD wood based plinth and have not looked back. Speed is absolutely constant and bang on regardless of stylus load.
Yep, at least 40 years old but for sure, the best Vinyl playback I’ve ever had. All my mates have gone the same way, buying up SP10’s and other high end Japanese direct drive TT’s from the 70/80’s. I would never again consider a basic belt drive, short of the Thorens TD-124 which sorry folks is actually belt driven albeit in a totally different way to an LP12 and most other TT’s out there.

I’ve learnt a hell of a lot on my 50 year journey. Seems bizarre that after that time I am now totally contentented with a 40 year old Japanese deck. What a nonsense this industry is.

User avatar
Dr Bunsen Honeydew
Posts: 30758
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:26 pm
Location: Muppet Labs
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 48 times

Re: Hi-Fi Honesty

Unread post by Dr Bunsen Honeydew »

I am a recent mover the other way. It is very much an if and but, but for me I am into bass weight and tightness and timing, for me I find the rhythm sections of all types of music, orchestral through to groups is the foundation of music that everything else hangs off, be it Mozart or the astonishingly tight rhythm section of the Wailers. Any belt drive kills it, cord drives retain it quite well but I have little experience of them, a good DD retains it better, but for me a good rim drive is the tightest without losing anything else in the music in the process. I may go back the other way especially if I could afford an Exclusive P2.

User avatar
Lindsayt
Posts: 4213
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:06 pm
Has thanked: 1079 times
Been thanked: 692 times
Nauru

Re: Hi-Fi Honesty

Unread post by Lindsayt »

In the early 1980's I can remeber reading plenty of magazine articles on how to get the best from the LP12. Going into minute detail.

Sitting it on a Sound Organisation table. Checking which way round the belt gave the most teardrop shape and using that. And then testing which direction of rotation of the belt sounded better. Not touching the belt with unwashed hands. Tightening up all the bolts beyond their elastic limits. Taking the lid off when listening. Removing the baseboard.

I don't remember reading any discussing how to get the best out of a Garrard or a Japanese direct drive.

Funny that.

User avatar
CN211276
Posts: 6522
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2016 9:29 am
Location: Cardiff
Has thanked: 1401 times
Been thanked: 976 times
EUROPEAN_UNION

Re: Hi-Fi Honesty

Unread post by CN211276 »

I remember the magazines of the early 80s maintaining that a quality TT had to be a belt drive suspended subchasi design. The reasoning was that a belt was required to eliminate vibration from the motor and springs were required for isolation from acoustic feed back. I suspect the Glasgow mafia was behind this.
Main System
NVA BMU, P90SA/A80s (latest spec), Cube 1s, TIS, TISC(LS7)
Sonore OpticalRendu, Chord Mscaler & Qutest, Sbooster PSs
Network Acoustics Eno, ifi iPurifier3, AQ JB FMJ, Cisco 2940 & 2960
DH Labs ethernet, BNC & USB cables, Farnells cat 8 ethernet cable

Second System
NVA P20/ A20, Cubettes, LS3, SSP, SC
Sonore MicroRendu, Chord Mojo 2 MCRU PSs, AQ Carbon USB cable & JB FMJ

Headphones
Grado SR325e/Chord Mojo, Beyerdynamic Avetho/AQ DF Colbat

RIP Doc

_D_S_J_R_
Posts: 4185
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:53 am
Location: The end of the road in Suffolk Coastal.
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 6 times
Wales

Re: Hi-Fi Honesty

Unread post by _D_S_J_R_ »

I think you'll find Acoustic Research were behind this statement originally and then Thorens! The LP12 is a blue printed TD150

Back in 1983, Linn were streets ahead of many other domestic audio companies as they had real live master grade recordings to use as a reference. My only sadness is that they took so long to sort the LP12 out (at sadly huge costs to the owners) and lift it hugely out of the fruitbox mire it was in. In 1987, I commented after a dem at Glasgow that vinyl was crap compared to the master source. They AGREED that vinyl was crap, but still felt their crap was better than everyone elses crap, but it was still crap. Shook me to the core that did and it wasn't until a year later that I was able to hear some top quality alternatives. By this time, owners of top direct drives were coming in for stylus and cartridge upgrades. Better sited on the specialist tables and wall shelves now available, these decks began to show their true superb colours imo.
Hanging on in quiet desperation is the English way...The time has gone, The song is over, Thought I'd something more to say...

User avatar
karatestu
Posts: 5945
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2017 4:40 pm
Location: North Yorkshire
Has thanked: 1865 times
Been thanked: 1378 times
Great Britain

Re: Hi-Fi Honesty

Unread post by karatestu »

Dr Bunsen Honeydew wrote: Sat Mar 30, 2019 1:39 am
I find the rhythm sections of all types of music, orchestral through to groups is the foundation of music that everything else hangs off, be it Mozart or the astonishingly tight rhythm section of the Wailers.
I have been trying to tell people that for a long time. Guitarists and singers are the worst for ignoring the importance of rhythm - at their peril. The bass player i was in countless bands with used to say we were there to make the other musicians look good. :lol:
DIY FREE ZONE

User avatar
Lindsayt
Posts: 4213
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:06 pm
Has thanked: 1079 times
Been thanked: 692 times
Nauru

Re: Hi-Fi Honesty

Unread post by Lindsayt »

I cannot agree with this: "Back in 1983, Linn were streets ahead of many other domestic audio companies as they had real live master grade recordings to use as a reference."

Linn could have had the London Symphony Orchestra playing live in their factory and they still would have produced the mediocrity that they did.

They and the UK hi-fi press were marketing Linn as producing the best turntable and speakers in the world in 1983. With the hindsight that we have now, Pioneer, Sony, Kenwood, JBL, Altec had them soundly beaten in those departments. Maybe they had access to record master tapes, maybe they didn't?

Having competent engineers that are given free reign is more important to the sound quality of the goods produced by any company than whether they are able to listen to master tapes or not.

The statement that I quoted from DSJR is typical of the Linn marketing rhetoric of the time, where they took every feature of their products and company, good bad or indifferent, and turned it into a reason why they were the best and everyone else was worse.

Post Reply