"Freedom" of speech

Forum for admin topics, member introductions and general non-hifi chitchat.
User avatar
terrybooth
Posts: 4396
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 6:49 pm
Location: West Yorkshire
Has thanked: 499 times
Been thanked: 246 times
Great Britain

"Freedom" of speech

Unread post by terrybooth »

I've been prompted by the Donster Junior saying that banning the DON from Twitter is a breach of his rights to freedom of speech and this article in the Grauniad.

For me, if there is a value in the ideal of 'freedom' of speech, it is around allowing all voices to be heard equally. As soon as someone starts using something to amplify their own voice, be it a megaphone or tweeting to 18 million followers, that equality is lost and the principle is compromised.

As soon as someone starts speaking there is a power relationship between the speaker and the listener, although we often frame this in the concept of manners - 'speak when you're spoken to', 'children should be seen and not heard'. In a sense, as soon as you allow someone else to speak or listen to them, you have submitted to them - temporarily at least. However, this is the roots of demagogic power, as every politician understands. Just go back and review a few Thatcher interviews, she was a master at wielding 'politeness' in her demagogy to shut people up.

Of course the Donster took this power much further to spread barefaced lies and hate favourable to his cause which would have hardly mattered if he had not already had so many people listening. Of course then you add to that the echo chamber effect - everybody just hearing back their own thoughts and ideas an no other, indeed using this power to shout down other voices - the impact is far greater.

So does the Donster have the right to free speech? I'd say as an individual, without amplification, yes, so long as he also listens (even then he is quite capable of co-ercing people). Where he has a track record of spouting untruths, hate and rabble rousing which has a clear and negative impact on other people and groups of people generating greater inequality (in short, not upholding the Constitution of the country which he has been elected to lead), clearly that right must be clearly circumscibed - it is not absolute.

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity..."
Pioneer PL71/DL103/ Phono2/HiFiPi/P90SA/TIS/CubixPro

User avatar
Lindsayt
Posts: 4213
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:06 pm
Has thanked: 1079 times
Been thanked: 692 times
Nauru

Re: "Freedom" of speech

Unread post by Lindsayt »

What about the rights of the owners of Twitter to decide who should be given a platform on their social media service?

What about basic contract law? Where 2 parties agree to do something? And where you can't have a contract where only 1 party agrees.

User avatar
slinger
Posts: 9233
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 4:30 pm
Location: The Garden of England
Has thanked: 4567 times
Been thanked: 3118 times
EUROPEAN_UNION

Re: "Freedom" of speech

Unread post by slinger »

Good post, Terry.

Too many people think that "free speech" equates to "I can say what I fucken like, and you can't stop me" and that is in no way restricted to America. You only have to witness some of the vile racist and just "wrong," posts on Twitter and the like claiming they are issued under the aegis of "free speech," many from people who really should know better, including, and especially the ignorant and arrogant Mr Toby Young.

I always refer people to the definition/explanation, from Amnesty. https://www.amnesty.org.uk/free-speech-freedom-expression-human-right

Free Speech is our right, under law, and it's our duty to defend it, but to do that we first have to understand exactly what it is.
Amps - NVA P50, AP30, A40, Stanislav Palo Tube Headphone Amp BB 85
Speakers - Monitor Audio Silver RX2
Cables - NVA LS1+LS3, SSC, Gotham S/PDIF, IBRA Optical
Digital - NAD C516BEE, SONY ST-SDB900 DAB TUNER, TEAC UD-H01 DAC
Analogue - Pro-Ject Debut Carbon Esprit SB, Graham Slee Gram Amp 2 Phono
Cans - Grado SR80, ATH-M50X

Daniel Quinn
Posts: 8586
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:16 am
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 399 times

Re: "Freedom" of speech

Unread post by Daniel Quinn »

Basically free speech should be you can say what you want as long as you don't break the laws of defamation.

This is the only way it works. Anything else and you have censors and censorship.

Toby Young talks a lot of shit, he also talks a lot of sense.

Increasingly people are advocating censorship of things they don't like without admitting this subverts free speech.
These users thanked the author Daniel Quinn for the post (total 2):
Ordinaryman (Sat Jan 09, 2021 4:14 pm) • slinger (Sat Jan 09, 2021 4:53 pm)

Ordinaryman
Posts: 475
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 4:50 pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 77 times
Great Britain

Re: "Freedom" of speech

Unread post by Ordinaryman »

Absolutely everyone is intituled to there own opinion. With the advent of the internet unfortunately these opinions spread faster than a forest fire. I was always taught to express my opinions but only ever face to face. If that is not possible then be prepared to do so when the time comes.

User avatar
Classicrock
Posts: 2316
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 12:51 pm
Location: Bristol
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 15 times
Great Britain

Re: "Freedom" of speech

Unread post by Classicrock »

In the case of Trump I think his comments come under breaking the Law as he was engaged in incitement. I'm sure he would have been banned long before if he hadn't been the President. If anything twitter and social media have been guilty of ignoring activity that contradicts the law. You can say all sorts of rubbish as opinion but encouraging rioting or terrorism certainly exceeds the boundaries of legal free speech subject to local laws.
I Know What I like (In Your Wardrobe)

Daniel Quinn
Posts: 8586
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:16 am
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 399 times

Re: "Freedom" of speech

Unread post by Daniel Quinn »

Your interpretation of trumps rhetoric is somewhat unique. As far as I am aware he never urged anybody to commit crime.

Personally I think the laws on inciting people to commit crime need review.we should start from the assumption that talking regardless of what is said should not be a crime.

Stemcor1990
Posts: 351
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2014 11:06 pm
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 23 times
Great Britain

Re: "Freedom" of speech

Unread post by Stemcor1990 »

I don’t have a problem with somebody having an opinion different to mine although I do get angry when the other person tries to take some sort of authority because they believe that their opinion is somehow “more important” than mine.

Social media cos have had to balance giving a platform to Trump with the “quality” of his posts. The “invasion” on 6th January appears to be the watershed moment when social media accepted that the President had crossed the red line.

montechristo358
Posts: 278
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2018 2:35 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 19 times
Great Britain

Re: "Freedom" of speech

Unread post by montechristo358 »

Daniel Quinn wrote: Sat Jan 09, 2021 6:21 pm Your interpretation of trumps rhetoric is somewhat unique. As far as I am aware he never urged anybody to commit crime.

Personally I think the laws on inciting people to commit crime need review.we should start from the assumption that talking regardless of what is said should not be a crime.
I would agree entirely
Bedroom Rig
PiCorePlayer Squeezebox clone, Allo Boss Dac, NVA AP10H with Stepped Attenuator upgrade and external PSU, Audioquest Nightowl Cans, NVA mini BMU

Office Rig
PicorepLayer Squezeebox clone with HifiBerry DIGI+, NVA SSP Digital, Arcam AV9. NVA SSC, NVA AP10P, NVA LS5, NVA Cubettes, NVA Mini BMU

Kitchen Rig
PicorepLayer Squezeebox clone with HifiBerry DAC+, NVA SSC, NVA P50, Project AMPBox, Sonance Ceiling Speakers

Ordinaryman
Posts: 475
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2019 4:50 pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 77 times
Great Britain

Re: "Freedom" of speech

Unread post by Ordinaryman »

I think many have "crossed the red line" and many times prior to. It would appear to be/is a platform for anyone and it would seem to be irrespective of their motives. As always its down to the individuals interpretations and how they react to it. Everyone imo tends to believe that their opinion is the most important.

Post Reply