Strictly Dancing.......

[valvesRus]

Nice picture, how could anyone be offended ?

I used to sell spare parts for Kubota mini excavators.

[savvypaul]

This has been reported......

Oh and not just to the owner of this forum.

There is no problem with the photo.

[Jammy Dodger]

Admin - deleted. Questioning admin decision publicly.

[TroutFisher]

Bigotry will not be tolerated. If you are so inclined, keep it to yourself.

Interesting that these days, morality seems to be redefined as bigotry.

Never the less, regardless of Jammy’s objection to DQ’s publication of pictures of his son with no clothes on, what appalls me is DQ’s willingness to do it in the first place. He seems oblivious of all the perverts out there who hook onto such innocently posted photo’s that they salivate and who knows what over them. It is the sort of photo they hook onto. I am speaking from experience having spent professional time investigating Paedophiles and their behaviour. As a parent, DQ is naively and inadvertently easily accommodating them as they search constantly on the web for such pictures. That’s what they do. What they do when they find them I’ll leave to your imagination. Think about it. Paedophiles get off on pictures of children fully dressed, in their school playground, just exactly doing that...playing and nothing more. What do they do with a naked boy in a digger cab? I appreciate there is no direct abuse, but for sure the image itself will titivate many with paedophilic tendencies. DQ needs to wake up and think about his protection of his children.

[George Hincapie]

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.

[savvypaul]

Bigotry will not be tolerated. If you are so inclined, keep it to yourself.

Interesting that these days, morality seems to be redefined as bigotry.

Never the less, regardless of Jammy’s objection to DQ’s publication of pictures of his son with no clothes on, what appalls me is DQ’s willingness to do it in the first place. He seems oblivious of all the perverts out there who hook onto such innocently posted photo’s that they salivate and who knows what over them. It is the sort of photo they hook onto. I am speaking from experience having spent professional time investigating Paedophiles and their behaviour. As a parent, DQ is naively and inadvertently easily accommodating them as they search constantly on the web for such pictures. That’s what they do. What they do when they find them I’ll leave to your imagination. Think about it. Paedophiles get off on pictures of children fully dressed, in their school playground, just exactly doing that...playing and nothing more. What do they do with a naked boy in a digger cab? I appreciate there is no direct abuse, but for sure the image itself will titivate many with paedophilic tendencies. DQ needs to wake up and think about his protection of his children.

You have applied my quote out of context. The quote referred to homophobia. Nothing to do with DQ's photo. Homophobia is not a question of morality. The law is, rightly, very clear about that. A person's sexuality is not a moral choice, it us 'the way you are wired'.

There are hundreds of thousands of images of children posted on Facebook, and other social media sites, every day. As far as I can see, this is no different. The image is not of a sexual nature, either in its content or its intentions.

Whether it is a good idea to post it on a public forum is a matter of opinion...but no more.

Now, strictly, back to dancing...

[joe]

Interesting that these days, morality seems to be redefined as bigotry..

What moral issues are raised by two blokes (or two women) dancing together?

[savvypaul]

Interesting that these days, morality seems to be redefined as bigotry..

What moral issues are raised by two blokes (or two women) dancing together?

None

[montechristo358]

since morals are quite personal I guess it depends on the individual

[savvypaul]

since morals are quite personal I guess it depends on the individual

So, what moral issues are raised by same sex partners dancing together?