The PC boot up and getting to "work" speed test

Forum for admin topics, member introductions and general non-hifi chitchat.
User avatar
Lindsayt
Posts: 4230
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:06 pm
Has thanked: 1103 times
Been thanked: 699 times
Nauru

Re: The PC boot up and getting to "work" speed test

Unread post by Lindsayt »

Jonty2547 wrote: Sun Mar 31, 2019 5:25 pm MacBook Air 2016 14.2 seconds.
Wouldn't own anything else!
That is impressive.

I had a feeling that the fastest PC's for this test would be non-Windows ones.

But even the slowest one, so far, at 40 seconds is still fine.

We've got a 15 year old Windows XP desktop PC with a mechanical hard drive that my wife uses. I wonder how that'll fare in this test?... :epopc:

User avatar
Jonty2547
Posts: 298
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 8:10 pm
Location: Suffolk
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: The PC boot up and getting to "work" speed test

Unread post by Jonty2547 »

You may be in for a long evening
TT- Thorens TD160B MKII with SME 3009, SL1210 and PL-71. Amps-NVA P50sa/A40's & Phono 1. CDP- Sony X555ES. Speakers-B&W 705 with LS1.
Headphone system Bushmaster II, Capella amp, Pi 3B+ with Hifiberry Digi+ Pro & Nighthawk cans.

User avatar
zebbo
Posts: 1741
Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 8:22 am
Location: As close to France as you can get.
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 28 times
Great Britain

Re: The PC boot up and getting to "work" speed test

Unread post by zebbo »

I think it does rather depend on how many apps/programs are loaded up at boot up.
Audio Grail "Sable" Garrard 401 with Cumbrian Green Slate plinth / Audiomods 6 / Benz Micro Gullwing SLR, Phono 2, NVA INT400sa. (Oh and a Copland CDA823 CD Player, for when I fancy a bit of the devil's spawn!) :lol:

User avatar
Fretless
Posts: 9320
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2014 12:15 pm
Location: Somewhere in Holland
Has thanked: 1510 times
Been thanked: 2300 times
Netherlands

Re: The PC boot up and getting to "work" speed test

Unread post by Fretless »

My 8-years old Dell Vostro laptop took 2.08 minutes . Windows 10. Intel dual-core 2.53 GHz CPU. 4GB RAM. (not SSD !!)

Upstairs:
Vinyl
Pro-Ject 1.2 + Grado Sig Jr + Cambridge Alva Duo
DigiVolumio PC + Kiss DP-500 + Sabaj A20d
NVA: Cube2 - SSP - LS6+ Sabaj A10a {x2)
Little Bear MC2 + AQ NightHawk
Downstairs:
Vinyl
Logic DM101 + Syrinx LE1 + Grado Sig MCX
DigiDenafrips Ares II + Volumio PC + Cambridge CXC
NVA: P50 & PSU - BMUAiyima A07 MAX + Arcam One
HP: Allo DigiOne + Sabaj A10d + AQ NightOwl
Office: Allo DigiOne SIG + SMSL M300se + Douk G4 (x2)
Mission 760 + Monolith 887 + German Maestro GMP 450

User avatar
Lindsayt
Posts: 4230
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:06 pm
Has thanked: 1103 times
Been thanked: 699 times
Nauru

Re: The PC boot up and getting to "work" speed test

Unread post by Lindsayt »

My wife's XP computer isn't quite as old as I thought. It has an Intel E6850 CPU, 4 GB Ram (think I fitted this as a later upgrade), 128GB SSD (replacement after original hard drive failed. Sorry guys, I'd totally forgotten I'd fitted this :oops: ). The CPU's original, so this must date from around 2008. I paid around £300 new for this, plus some extra for replacement bits as they broke.

First test it took 1 minute 20 secs to power up, boot, load Windows XP, load Firefox and get into this HFS thread.

With a couple of minutes of tweaking to the Bios and the programmes being loaded on startup, I got it down to 63 seconds. :dance:

It takes about 20 seconds to do the POST on powering up. Not a lot I can do to speed that up. Fast boot was already enabled. XP loads pretty quickly. And then there's an annoying delay whist the network card / network settings sorts itself out.

Still, not bad for a crappy old Windows XP PC.

Geoff.R.G
Posts: 1569
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2016 2:46 pm
Location: Denham UK
Has thanked: 133 times
Been thanked: 483 times
Great Britain

Re: The PC boot up and getting to "work" speed test

Unread post by Geoff.R.G »

I very rarely power down my Macs, I simply close the lid and they go to sleep, so from sleep to signed in on the forum 2 or 3 seconds. That isn't what was asked but it is how I use my computers.

User avatar
kimangelis
Posts: 518
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:01 pm
Location: UK
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Great Britain

Re: The PC boot up and getting to "work" speed test

Unread post by kimangelis »

If you want your PC to boot and load a browser faster..... then load more RAM and go to a SSD if you can afford it. I run a HP Envy with a 256Gb SSD and 16Gb RAM. Boots and loads Chrome in 12 seconds. OS is Windows 10.
Primare CD22. Primare DAB/FM radio. SSP to NVA AP70 and AP10H(JS) with Denon AH-D7100's. LS5 to Cube2's.

User avatar
applemarc
Posts: 593
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:42 pm
Location: Gidea Park Essex
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Re: The PC boot up and getting to "work" speed test

Unread post by applemarc »

17 seconds for my Mac Pro with 1TB SSD 24Gb ram cost alot in 2010
Beresford Caiman Ipod

User avatar
Lindsayt
Posts: 4230
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:06 pm
Has thanked: 1103 times
Been thanked: 699 times
Nauru

Re: The PC boot up and getting to "work" speed test

Unread post by Lindsayt »

This one was a challenge. I found a dusty old Dell D600 laptop that used to have Windows XP on it. This dates from 2004. I got it for free, some time ago, as a cast-off. It has an Intel Pentium M 1.6 GHZ CPU, 512 MB RAM, a 30 GB mechanical hard drive.

Initially it failed this test as it wouldn't boot thanks to a corrupt .dll file.

So I loaded CorePlus Linux, Dillo web browser and tested it at...

65 seconds! :dance:

Opera9 was better at displaying this forum than Dillo, but it was slower. Firefox ran like a beached blue whale.

If I dispensed with the GUI, fitted a new clock battery and sussed out how to use bookmarks in Dillo, I'd shave a few seconds off that time.

User avatar
scotty38
Posts: 301
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2018 12:51 am
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 4 times
Kiribati

Re: The PC boot up and getting to "work" speed test

Unread post by scotty38 »

For various reason I just changed my Linux machine back to windows 10. I haven't done this test yet but one thing I do know is that it's significantly slower to boot than Linux was....

As above from sleep Linux was 2/3 seconds Win10 is a lot more than that.

Post Reply