The reality of magazine reviews

Forum for admin topics, member introductions and general non-hifi chitchat.
User avatar
It is I, Leclerc
Posts: 86
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 7:59 am
Location: Nouvion
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

The reality of magazine reviews

Unread post by It is I, Leclerc »

As it say in the title:

Image

It were ever so.
These users thanked the author It is I, Leclerc for the post:
Lindsayt (Fri Apr 21, 2023 4:43 pm)

_D_S_J_R_
Posts: 4185
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:53 am
Location: The end of the road in Suffolk Coastal.
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 6 times
Wales

Re: The reality of magazine reviews

Unread post by _D_S_J_R_ »

Gramophone magazine in its heyday used to abandon reviews of bad products, so everything they reviewed had good reviews as a result. Other reviewers had commercial consultancy interests (Martin Colloms for one). Ken kessler said one thing in HFN and I remember other things in trade parers we used to get.
Hanging on in quiet desperation is the English way...The time has gone, The song is over, Thought I'd something more to say...

User avatar
Classicrock
Posts: 2316
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 12:51 pm
Location: Bristol
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 15 times
Great Britain

Re: The reality of magazine reviews

Unread post by Classicrock »

I'm sure they admitted in Hi-Fi World that if they got a real poor sounding product they did not proceed with the review. I don't think it's completely fair to say commercial interests mostly cause this. I'm sure however that they either assume they got a faulty example or are worried by the maker taking legal action. Anyway no review will hardly help sales in most cases. I think Rega in the old days were the exception but had more orders then they could make in those days without an official review. On the other side of the coin it's possible certain magazines give 4 or 5 star reviews to certain major brands even if they sound pretty uninspiring. This rather undermines the genuine 5 star reviews that some products may deserve.
I Know What I like (In Your Wardrobe)

joe
Posts: 1156
Joined: Thu Apr 04, 2013 12:48 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: The reality of magazine reviews

Unread post by joe »

The argument sometimes given is that people don't want to read bad reviews, but I suspect the reality is that it's manufacturers/advertisers who don't want to read them. The worst example I can recall is from HiFi+ some years back. An expensive amp, from a frequent advertiser, was given a lukewarm, indeed by HiFi+ standards a scathing review. The very next issue, the then-editor re-reviewed it and gave it a glowing write-up.

Effectively, readers are expected to read between the lines, looking out for faint praise and 'codewords' to spot poor products.

User avatar
Dr Bunsen Honeydew
Posts: 30758
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:26 pm
Location: Muppet Labs
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 48 times

Re: The reality of magazine reviews

Unread post by Dr Bunsen Honeydew »

So you see why mainstream manufacturers hate forums and try to damage them with plants glove puppets shill and spammers.

User avatar
Classicrock
Posts: 2316
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2013 12:51 pm
Location: Bristol
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 15 times
Great Britain

Re: The reality of magazine reviews

Unread post by Classicrock »

Dr Bunsen Honeydew wrote: Sun Aug 05, 2018 11:15 am So you see why mainstream manufacturers hate forums and try to damage them with plants glove puppets shill and spammers.
I don't see much related to 'mainstream' companies. Only that guy from Rega on PFM. Linn and Naim don't need glove puppets as there are plenty members who they brainwashed 30 years ago. Most of the problems come from small manufacturers and upmarket retailers who inhabit the forums. (I'm excluding manufacturers own forums from those comments).
I Know What I like (In Your Wardrobe)

OrangeFixie
Posts: 62
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2017 6:25 pm
Location: Bristol, UK.
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 20 times
EUROPEAN_UNION

Re: The reality of magazine reviews

Unread post by OrangeFixie »

I was introduced to NVA amplification years ago via a glowing review by Ken Kessler in Hi-Fi News and still enjoy listening to music through my NVA amp. I have bought various bits of kit as a result of reading reviews but as with album reviews, they can never tell you whether you will like the item you have bought or not!

Abdulrashidbala
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2023 8:41 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
United States of America

Re: The reality of magazine reviews

Unread post by Abdulrashidbala »

I just stumbled across your post, and I wanna say that many of those reviews in magazines are just prepaid ads. I'm pretty sure many authors didn't even see those hi-fi systems alive.

Burburuzan
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2023 5:00 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
United States of America

Re: The reality of magazine reviews

Unread post by Burburuzan »

I totally get what you mean about magazine reviews - it's hard to know what to trust sometimes. It's pretty sketchy when reviewers have commercial interests or when magazines only give good reviews to keep their advertisers happy. But you know what I've been getting into lately? Book reviews! I feel like they're a little more honest because the author actually has to read the book before reviewing it.I recently stumbled across some info about literary magazines accepting submissions, which might be helpful if you're into reading like I am. I love finding new books to add to my reading list, and these magazines can be a great resource for discovering up-and-coming authors.

User avatar
Lindsayt
Posts: 4213
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:06 pm
Has thanked: 1079 times
Been thanked: 692 times
Nauru

Re: The reality of magazine reviews

Unread post by Lindsayt »

There's an oxymoron in the title of this thread. :teasing-poke:
These users thanked the author Lindsayt for the post:
karatestu (Thu Apr 27, 2023 6:07 am)

Post Reply