Tax
-
- Posts: 8586
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:16 am
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 399 times
Re: The Audio Standard Forum.
Yes but individual morals allow millionaires to avoid tax without any compunction.
- Dr Bunsen Honeydew
- Posts: 30758
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:26 pm
- Location: Muppet Labs
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 48 times
Re: The Audio Standard Forum.
Isn't it morals and lack of morals. Avoiding tax would be lack of morals, an individuals conscious decision.
You see it in nature all the time. Commonly known as survival of the fittest.
You see it in nature all the time. Commonly known as survival of the fittest.
-
- Posts: 8586
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:16 am
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 399 times
- Dr Bunsen Honeydew
- Posts: 30758
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:26 pm
- Location: Muppet Labs
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 48 times
Re: The Audio Standard Forum.
If they have the power base or the bribery power to get away with it then yes. Every African country runs on it and the bribes.
- Lindsayt
- Posts: 4232
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:06 pm
- Has thanked: 1110 times
- Been thanked: 701 times
Re: The Audio Standard Forum.
There's a big difference between tax avoidance (legal) and tax evasion (illegal).
I would encourage everyone to avoid as much tax as they can.
I cannot condone tax evasion.
I would encourage everyone to avoid as much tax as they can.
I cannot condone tax evasion.
- Dr Bunsen Honeydew
- Posts: 30758
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:26 pm
- Location: Muppet Labs
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 48 times
Re: The Audio Standard Forum.
People don't realise that tax is a relatively knew thing. Income Tax came in because of the 1st world war with a promise it would end at the end of it Purchase Tax (the precurser to VAT) was introduced in the 2nd world war with a promise it would end at the end of it
So how did the country survive without it when there was no war? pretty well I think!
I am sorry but tax is legalised theft - full stop. So IMO is completely immoral and only exists because it is reinforced by law and punishment. If tax was voluntary how many of you would pay it?
So how did the country survive without it when there was no war? pretty well I think!
I am sorry but tax is legalised theft - full stop. So IMO is completely immoral and only exists because it is reinforced by law and punishment. If tax was voluntary how many of you would pay it?
- Fretless
- Posts: 9328
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2014 12:15 pm
- Location: Somewhere in Holland
- Has thanked: 1514 times
- Been thanked: 2310 times
Re: The Audio Standard Forum.
Without taxes there wouldn't be any really important things done in the EU - like moving the whole parliament from Brussels to Strasburg and back every month.
Only costs about 200,000,000 euro per year. Come on - we all really want to keep wonderful institutions like this don't we?
Only costs about 200,000,000 euro per year. Come on - we all really want to keep wonderful institutions like this don't we?
Upstairs:
VinylPro-Ject 1.2 + Grado Sig Jr + Cambridge Alva Duo
DigiVolumio PC + Kiss DP-500 + Sabaj A20d
NVA: Cube2 - SSP - LS6+ Sabaj A10a {x2)
Little Bear MC2 + AQ NightHawk
Downstairs:
VinylLogic DM101 + Syrinx LE1 + Grado Sig MCX
DigiDenafrips Ares II + Volumio PC + Cambridge CXC
NVA: P50 & PSU - BMUAiyima A07 MAX + Arcam One
HP: Allo DigiOne + Sabaj A10d + AQ NightOwl
Office: Allo DigiOne SIG + SMSL M300se + Douk G4 (x2)
Mission 760 + Monolith 887 + German Maestro GMP 450
Re: The Audio Standard Forum.
Ummm, really? (And to be sure, taxation went back well before that to around the time of the third crusade in the 1100's).Dr Bunsen Honeydew wrote:People don't realise that tax is a relatively knew thing. Income Tax came in because of the 1st world war with a promise it would end at the end of it Purchase Tax (the precurser to VAT) was introduced in the 2nd world war with a promise it would end at the end of it
from Wiki......
History
Modern era
William Pitt the Younger introduced a progressive income tax in 1798.
The inception date of the modern income tax is typically accepted as 1799,[4] at the suggestion of Dr Beeke, Dean of Bristol.[5] This income tax was introduced into Great Britain by Prime Minister William Pitt the Younger in his budget of December 1798, to pay for weapons and equipment for the French Revolutionary War. Pitt's new graduated (progressive) income tax began at a levy of 2 old pence in the pound (1/120) on incomes over £60 (£5,511 as of 2015),[6] and increased up to a maximum of 2 shillings in the pound (10%) on incomes of over £200. Pitt hoped that the new income tax would raise £10 million a year, but actual receipts for 1799 totalled only a little over £6 million.[7]
Pitt's income tax was levied from 1799 to 1802, when it was abolished by Henry Addington during the Peace of Amiens. Addington had taken over as prime minister in 1801, after Pitt's resignation over Catholic Emancipation. The income tax was reintroduced by Addington in 1803 when hostilities with France recommenced, but it was again abolished in 1816, one year after the Battle of Waterloo. Opponents of the tax, who thought it should only be used to finance wars, wanted all records of the tax destroyed along with its repeal. Records were publicly burned by the Chancellor of the Exchequer, but copies were retained in the basement of the tax court.[8]
Punch cartoon (1907); illustrates the unpopularity amongst Punch readers of a proposed 1907 income tax by the Labour Party in the United Kingdom.
In the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, income tax was reintroduced by Sir Robert Peel by the Income Tax Act 1842. Peel, as a Conservative, had opposed income tax in the 1841 general election, but a growing budget deficit required a new source of funds. The new income tax, based on Addington's model, was imposed on incomes above £150 (£12,320 as of 2015),[6]. Although this measure was initially intended to be temporary, it soon became a fixture of the British taxation system.
A committee was formed in 1851 under Joseph Hume to investigate the matter, but failed to reach a clear recommendation. Despite the vociferous objection, William Gladstone, Chancellor of the Exchequer from 1852, kept the progressive income tax, and extended it to cover the costs of the Crimean War. By the 1860s, the progressive tax had become a grudgingly accepted element of the English fiscal system.[9]
- Lindsayt
- Posts: 4232
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:06 pm
- Has thanked: 1110 times
- Been thanked: 701 times
Re: The Audio Standard Forum.
Cneck out the history of UK Government spending as a percentage of GDP here: http://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/numbers?units=p and here: http://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/past_spending
Over the last 100 years the long term trend has been for it to go up and up and up.
Also, Government spending increased in real terms during the Thatcher years. One could argue that spending should have increased with the massive rise of unemployment between 1979 and 1983, but spending didn't go down when unemployment went down. In purely monetary terms, Thatcher was a Big Government Spending Socialist.
Over the last 100 years the long term trend has been for it to go up and up and up.
Also, Government spending increased in real terms during the Thatcher years. One could argue that spending should have increased with the massive rise of unemployment between 1979 and 1983, but spending didn't go down when unemployment went down. In purely monetary terms, Thatcher was a Big Government Spending Socialist.
-
- Posts: 8586
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:16 am
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 399 times