Great points re the electric guitars - they're something which really interests me (not just because I always wish I'd learnt to play one!) about these. The differences wrought through the use of differing amps/valves etc to tailor the sound to the player's taste and technique fascinates me - how a valve 'breaks up' etc etc. The same could of course be put for most instruments which rely on other factors for their sound quality - I use a French Clarinet (Buffet RC Prestige), chosen because it has a slightly bigger bore and tone than the R13 version. I much prefer it to British Clarinets (not that there are any left new now) and their presentation which is a bit soft and 'woofly' for my tastes.slinger wrote: It's the same with electric guitars. I know what a Tele or a Ricky or a Les Paul sounds like...through my amp, with my effects pedals. Play them through an amp I've never used with a set of pedals I've never owned and I might not have a clue which was which.
And what's my point? It's that you're right. Most of the time we have to decide whether different is better, or just different.
This is all talking about production (what goes into the mic/mixing desk etc) though rather than reproduction which is what comes out of our domestic speakers. This is one reason why, much as I enjoy them in isolation, I find valve amps difficult to put up with for too long. They're affecting the sound after production and colouring the reproduction.
By all means use them to colour the production ie give the guitarist the absolute freedom in sound colour that he or she wants. However, once that sound gets onto the mastertape, its sound should be set in stone and we should bugger about with it as little as possible.