Some years ago I had a fiddle and think I agreed with the above post from CN about bit rate.
At least at the values I experimented with, for me increasing bit rate was where it was at. I seem to recall that I preferred 48/24 to 192/16. 192/24 was probably best of all. I can’t remember.
Hi-res sample rates - a genuine improvement in SQ, or a marketing trick?
- Docfoster
- Posts: 231
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2019 11:06 am
- Has thanked: 33 times
- Been thanked: 129 times
- Contact:
Re: Hi-res sample rates - a genuine improvement in SQ, or a marketing trick?
System 1: JRiver MC24 > Dell Latitude 7270 > Asus Xonar Essence One Muses Edition DAC & pre- > One4 Class A power amp (with Dynamic PSU boards) > DIY Monacor SP-310CX speakers & DIY Dayton Audio SD315A-88 bass cab.
LC Audio Technology mains DC filter > Sovereign MTBPS balanced power supply
TQ (Wonfor) Ultra Black cables.
System 2: Anything with a headphone socket > Inca Tech Claymore > DIY Monacor SP-308CX speakers
LC Audio Technology mains DC filter > Sovereign MTBPS balanced power supply
TQ (Wonfor) Ultra Black cables.
System 2: Anything with a headphone socket > Inca Tech Claymore > DIY Monacor SP-308CX speakers
-
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2018 2:18 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Hi-res sample rates - a genuine improvement in SQ, or a marketing trick?
If checking hires vs redbook you have to start with the hires master and down sample to ensure an identical master for the redbook version. Otherwise you could be hearing different mastering.
Likewise any DUT has to be checked with upsampled redbook being used to prove that the hires data path itself and effects of filter feedback arent audible.
Then and only then can you proceed with a valid test using downsampled hires as the source.
Ime theres no difference beyond the audibility of filter feedback.
I'll buy hires when available though because it's usually more sympathetically mastered than brick walled and dynamically compressed redbook
Likewise any DUT has to be checked with upsampled redbook being used to prove that the hires data path itself and effects of filter feedback arent audible.
Then and only then can you proceed with a valid test using downsampled hires as the source.
Ime theres no difference beyond the audibility of filter feedback.
I'll buy hires when available though because it's usually more sympathetically mastered than brick walled and dynamically compressed redbook
- CN211276
- Posts: 6547
- Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2016 9:29 am
- Location: Cardiff
- Has thanked: 1423 times
- Been thanked: 987 times
Re: Hi-res sample rates - a genuine improvement in SQ, or a marketing trick?
https://www.fairobserver.com/more/scien ... tky-39078/
This article is relevant to the thread and interesting. There is a lengthy thread about it on Wam, but I first came across it on the Chord Facebook page, the content of the article supporting the views of Rob Watts.
The gist of the article is that the 44kHz cap on CDs is too low and that frequencies well beyond the range of human hearing have a major influence on the frequencies which are audible and our enjoyment of music. For this reason analogue is still popular and many prefer it to digital, although in terms of measurements it is not in the same league.
From personal experience I concur with the above. Preference between analogue and Redbook digital is subjective and I can understand why there are diverging opinions about which sounds best. It is swings and roundabouts. However, to these ears, upsampling takes digital to a different level. In hifi terms this mainly concerns the sound stage, but there are other aspects which are not easy to describe. For me the reproduction of frequencies well beyond my range of hearing increase emotional involvement and encourage me to play more music. Although I have not heard super tweeters I would imagine that they have a similar effect. Our enjoyment of music is enhanced by frequencies above 20,000kHz, the extent to which I believe is dependent upon the individual.
As well as individual perception of frequencies beyond the range of human hearing I have found that reproduction equipment has a major part to play. In this respect I think the NVA less is more design philosophy is a big winner because there is less getting in the way, most notably filters, of ultrasonic frequencies. When I heard the Chord Mscaler at a dealer I was not greatly impressed. When in my system it was a night and day difference in comparison. My system without the Mscaler sounded better than the more expensive dealers demonstration system with it. I am coming round to thinking that it is the ability of NVA equipment to reproduce frequencies beyond the range of human hearing which attracts it to so many vinyl devotees.
This article is relevant to the thread and interesting. There is a lengthy thread about it on Wam, but I first came across it on the Chord Facebook page, the content of the article supporting the views of Rob Watts.
The gist of the article is that the 44kHz cap on CDs is too low and that frequencies well beyond the range of human hearing have a major influence on the frequencies which are audible and our enjoyment of music. For this reason analogue is still popular and many prefer it to digital, although in terms of measurements it is not in the same league.
From personal experience I concur with the above. Preference between analogue and Redbook digital is subjective and I can understand why there are diverging opinions about which sounds best. It is swings and roundabouts. However, to these ears, upsampling takes digital to a different level. In hifi terms this mainly concerns the sound stage, but there are other aspects which are not easy to describe. For me the reproduction of frequencies well beyond my range of hearing increase emotional involvement and encourage me to play more music. Although I have not heard super tweeters I would imagine that they have a similar effect. Our enjoyment of music is enhanced by frequencies above 20,000kHz, the extent to which I believe is dependent upon the individual.
As well as individual perception of frequencies beyond the range of human hearing I have found that reproduction equipment has a major part to play. In this respect I think the NVA less is more design philosophy is a big winner because there is less getting in the way, most notably filters, of ultrasonic frequencies. When I heard the Chord Mscaler at a dealer I was not greatly impressed. When in my system it was a night and day difference in comparison. My system without the Mscaler sounded better than the more expensive dealers demonstration system with it. I am coming round to thinking that it is the ability of NVA equipment to reproduce frequencies beyond the range of human hearing which attracts it to so many vinyl devotees.
Main System
NVA BMU, P90SA/A80s (latest spec), Cube 1s, TIS, TISC(LS7)
Sonore OpticalRendu, Chord Mscaler & Qutest, Sbooster PSs
Network Acoustics Eno, ifi iPurifier3, AQ JB FMJ, Cisco 2940 & 2960
DH Labs ethernet, BNC & USB cables, Lindy cat 6 US ethernet cable
Second System
NVA P20/ A20, Cubettes, LS3, SSP, SC
Sonore MicroRendu, Chord Mojo 2 MCRU PSs, AQ Carbon USB cable & JB FMJ
Headphones
Grado SR325e/Chord Mojo, Beyerdynamic Avetho/AQ DF Colbat
RIP Doc
NVA BMU, P90SA/A80s (latest spec), Cube 1s, TIS, TISC(LS7)
Sonore OpticalRendu, Chord Mscaler & Qutest, Sbooster PSs
Network Acoustics Eno, ifi iPurifier3, AQ JB FMJ, Cisco 2940 & 2960
DH Labs ethernet, BNC & USB cables, Lindy cat 6 US ethernet cable
Second System
NVA P20/ A20, Cubettes, LS3, SSP, SC
Sonore MicroRendu, Chord Mojo 2 MCRU PSs, AQ Carbon USB cable & JB FMJ
Headphones
Grado SR325e/Chord Mojo, Beyerdynamic Avetho/AQ DF Colbat
RIP Doc
-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2018 2:35 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 19 times
Re: Hi-res sample rates - a genuine improvement in SQ, or a marketing trick?
i totally get why higher sample rates can sound better but i really struggle with upsampling its just guesswork
Bedroom Rig
PiCorePlayer Squeezebox clone, Allo Boss Dac, NVA AP10H with Stepped Attenuator upgrade and external PSU, Audioquest Nightowl Cans, NVA mini BMU
Office Rig
PicorepLayer Squezeebox clone with HifiBerry DIGI+, NVA SSP Digital, Arcam AV9. NVA SSC, NVA AP10P, NVA LS5, NVA Cubettes, NVA Mini BMU
Kitchen Rig
PicorepLayer Squezeebox clone with HifiBerry DAC+, NVA SSC, NVA P50, Project AMPBox, Sonance Ceiling Speakers
PiCorePlayer Squeezebox clone, Allo Boss Dac, NVA AP10H with Stepped Attenuator upgrade and external PSU, Audioquest Nightowl Cans, NVA mini BMU
Office Rig
PicorepLayer Squezeebox clone with HifiBerry DIGI+, NVA SSP Digital, Arcam AV9. NVA SSC, NVA AP10P, NVA LS5, NVA Cubettes, NVA Mini BMU
Kitchen Rig
PicorepLayer Squezeebox clone with HifiBerry DAC+, NVA SSC, NVA P50, Project AMPBox, Sonance Ceiling Speakers
-
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2018 2:18 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Hi-res sample rates - a genuine improvement in SQ, or a marketing trick?
The point is that maybe its just the fact that the filters for high res dont fold back in title audible spectrum that makes high res sound better, not the higher res itself. Hence my prior advice to eliminate both confounding results from dac data path and mastering differences before assuming one knows what differences one is actually listening to.
- TheMadMick
- Posts: 437
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2017 9:50 am
- Location: SOUTHPORT, UK
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 141 times
Re: Hi-res sample rates - a genuine improvement in SQ, or a marketing trick?
Ultimately, it's a cost benefit decision. If you can buy a CD on, say, e bay for under £10.00 and the high res is, say, £17.00 - is the extra worth it?
Personally, I read that downsampled hi res to CD was almost indistinguishable from it's hi res original. That suits my prejudices and I'm inclined to believe it. Let's face it, it's all about the music.
Personally, I read that downsampled hi res to CD was almost indistinguishable from it's hi res original. That suits my prejudices and I'm inclined to believe it. Let's face it, it's all about the music.
Blusound Vault 2, P50SA, A80's, BMU, TIS, LS7, MA PL200, Meridian 506 (18 bit).
- Fretless
- Posts: 9320
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2014 12:15 pm
- Location: Somewhere in Holland
- Has thanked: 1510 times
- Been thanked: 2300 times
Re: Hi-res sample rates - a genuine improvement in SQ, or a marketing trick?
Is it me - or is there some confusion here between 44.1KHz sampling rate and the audible sound-wave frequency that with most speakers & headphones rolls off at about 20KHz?
The sampling rate, the number of times per second that the musical signal is digitally stored, is indicative of how accurately the sound-waves are reproduced. Higher rate => smaller increments => more accuracy.
Ultrasonics are often filtered out in most DAC's which is one reason NOS devices can sound more 'natural'.
The sampling rate, the number of times per second that the musical signal is digitally stored, is indicative of how accurately the sound-waves are reproduced. Higher rate => smaller increments => more accuracy.
Ultrasonics are often filtered out in most DAC's which is one reason NOS devices can sound more 'natural'.
Upstairs:
VinylPro-Ject 1.2 + Grado Sig Jr + Cambridge Alva Duo
DigiVolumio PC + Kiss DP-500 + Sabaj A20d
NVA: Cube2 - SSP - LS6+ Sabaj A10a {x2)
Little Bear MC2 + AQ NightHawk
Downstairs:
VinylLogic DM101 + Syrinx LE1 + Grado Sig MCX
DigiDenafrips Ares II + Volumio PC + Cambridge CXC
NVA: P50 & PSU - BMUAiyima A07 MAX + Arcam One
HP: Allo DigiOne + Sabaj A10d + AQ NightOwl
Office: Allo DigiOne SIG + SMSL M300se + Douk G4 (x2)
Mission 760 + Monolith 887 + German Maestro GMP 450
- CN211276
- Posts: 6547
- Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2016 9:29 am
- Location: Cardiff
- Has thanked: 1423 times
- Been thanked: 987 times
Re: Hi-res sample rates - a genuine improvement in SQ, or a marketing trick?
I share the confusion. Audio frequencies do roll off, especially with vinyi, but there is something that comes through, which cant be measured, which we can precieve and contributes to the musical experience.
Main System
NVA BMU, P90SA/A80s (latest spec), Cube 1s, TIS, TISC(LS7)
Sonore OpticalRendu, Chord Mscaler & Qutest, Sbooster PSs
Network Acoustics Eno, ifi iPurifier3, AQ JB FMJ, Cisco 2940 & 2960
DH Labs ethernet, BNC & USB cables, Lindy cat 6 US ethernet cable
Second System
NVA P20/ A20, Cubettes, LS3, SSP, SC
Sonore MicroRendu, Chord Mojo 2 MCRU PSs, AQ Carbon USB cable & JB FMJ
Headphones
Grado SR325e/Chord Mojo, Beyerdynamic Avetho/AQ DF Colbat
RIP Doc
NVA BMU, P90SA/A80s (latest spec), Cube 1s, TIS, TISC(LS7)
Sonore OpticalRendu, Chord Mscaler & Qutest, Sbooster PSs
Network Acoustics Eno, ifi iPurifier3, AQ JB FMJ, Cisco 2940 & 2960
DH Labs ethernet, BNC & USB cables, Lindy cat 6 US ethernet cable
Second System
NVA P20/ A20, Cubettes, LS3, SSP, SC
Sonore MicroRendu, Chord Mojo 2 MCRU PSs, AQ Carbon USB cable & JB FMJ
Headphones
Grado SR325e/Chord Mojo, Beyerdynamic Avetho/AQ DF Colbat
RIP Doc
-
- Posts: 933
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 1:58 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 16 times
Re: Hi-res sample rates - a genuine improvement in SQ, or a marketing trick?
Not sure what you mean by "accuracy", but the sample rate alters the maximum frequency that can be stored. Remember that to sample at 44.1k, there is a low pass filter in front of the ADC that removes the signal above 22kHz (more like 20k n practice to allow for filter roll off).The sampling rate, the number of times per second that the musical signal is digitally stored, is indicative of how accurately the sound-waves are reproduced. Higher rate => smaller increments => more accuracy.