Digital Upscaling
-
- Posts: 933
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 1:58 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 16 times
Re: Digital Upscaling
OK, I used it with a DAC that only goes to 192k. Would be interesting to hear the two together some time.
I compared the direct and up-sampled output with the same DAC, yes.
I compared the direct and up-sampled output with the same DAC, yes.
-
- Posts: 446
- Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2017 10:25 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 20 times
Re: Digital Upscaling
Would be interesting to hear this against a good NOS dac playing the same music. Recently I have been looking at NOS ladder dacs and wondering if it is maybe the better way to go. KISS. I have to wait for funds to replenish though as I just got myself a GL75 project.
-
- Posts: 933
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 1:58 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 16 times
Re: Digital Upscaling
The problem (IMHO) with talking about KISS is that we normally make a choice of what actually is simple based on gut feeling instead of any reality. There is a good argument that a delta sigma dac is simpler than a R2R ladder dac, that’s why they started making them after all.Recently I have been looking at NOS ladder dacs and wondering if it is maybe the better way to go. KISS.
- Fretless
- Posts: 9328
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2014 12:15 pm
- Location: Somewhere in Holland
- Has thanked: 1514 times
- Been thanked: 2310 times
Re: Digital Upscaling
So far, I have found the NOS approach (as used in the Metrum DAC's) to be more musically satisfying than any oversampling systems that I have heard (e.g.: Hegel, MF, Mark Levinson, Moon, Cambridge). The direct processing of 16-bit (CD) datastream to an analogue signal without oversampling / filtering / general-messing-about, keeps things somehow 'intact'.
However the idea of an upscaler that takes this same signal and refines it by a factor of 16x does look appealing (if done well) and I would certainly be interested to hear what it can do.
However the idea of an upscaler that takes this same signal and refines it by a factor of 16x does look appealing (if done well) and I would certainly be interested to hear what it can do.
Upstairs:
VinylPro-Ject 1.2 + Grado Sig Jr + Cambridge Alva Duo
DigiVolumio PC + Kiss DP-500 + Sabaj A20d
NVA: Cube2 - SSP - LS6+ Sabaj A10a {x2)
Little Bear MC2 + AQ NightHawk
Downstairs:
VinylLogic DM101 + Syrinx LE1 + Grado Sig MCX
DigiDenafrips Ares II + Volumio PC + Cambridge CXC
NVA: P50 & PSU - BMUAiyima A07 MAX + Arcam One
HP: Allo DigiOne + Sabaj A10d + AQ NightOwl
Office: Allo DigiOne SIG + SMSL M300se + Douk G4 (x2)
Mission 760 + Monolith 887 + German Maestro GMP 450
- CN211276
- Posts: 6552
- Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2016 9:29 am
- Location: Cardiff
- Has thanked: 1425 times
- Been thanked: 988 times
Re: Digital Upscaling
My experience of the Mscaler and also 192hz streams has lead me to the conclusion that standard 16 Bit 44hz is somewhat lacking. I am now better able to understand why many prefer a top quality analogue front end, inspite of all its well documented imperfections, to digital.
Main System
NVA BMU, P90SA/A80s (latest spec), Cube 1s, TIS, TISC(LS7)
Sonore OpticalRendu, Chord Mscaler & Qutest, Sbooster PSs
Network Acoustics Eno, ifi iPurifier3, AQ JB FMJ, Cisco 2940 & 2960
DH Labs ethernet, BNC & USB cables, Lindy cat 6 US ethernet cable
Second System
NVA P20/ A20, Cubettes, LS3, SSP, SC
Sonore MicroRendu, Chord Mojo 2 MCRU PSs, AQ Carbon USB cable & JB FMJ
Headphones
Grado SR325e/Chord Mojo, Beyerdynamic Avetho/AQ DF Colbat
RIP Doc
NVA BMU, P90SA/A80s (latest spec), Cube 1s, TIS, TISC(LS7)
Sonore OpticalRendu, Chord Mscaler & Qutest, Sbooster PSs
Network Acoustics Eno, ifi iPurifier3, AQ JB FMJ, Cisco 2940 & 2960
DH Labs ethernet, BNC & USB cables, Lindy cat 6 US ethernet cable
Second System
NVA P20/ A20, Cubettes, LS3, SSP, SC
Sonore MicroRendu, Chord Mojo 2 MCRU PSs, AQ Carbon USB cable & JB FMJ
Headphones
Grado SR325e/Chord Mojo, Beyerdynamic Avetho/AQ DF Colbat
RIP Doc
- Dr Bunsen Honeydew
- Posts: 30758
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:26 pm
- Location: Muppet Labs
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 48 times
Re: Digital Upscaling
£5 is all I will spend on a DAC and spend lots more on its power supply.
Is the small amount of benefit worth these ridiculous amounts of money being spent.
Is the small amount of benefit worth these ridiculous amounts of money being spent.
-
- Posts: 933
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 1:58 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 16 times
Re: Digital Upscaling
The problem is (and I don't mean to be insulting but...) you have a word soup of things there (NOS,oversampling,filtering,refines) and without being clear what you mean (or what others mean) by them its hard to be precise.Fretless wrote: ↑Thu Feb 21, 2019 11:08 am So far, I have found the NOS approach (as used in the Metrum DAC's) to be more musically satisfying than any oversampling systems that I have heard (e.g.: Hegel, MF, Mark Levinson, Moon, Cambridge). The direct processing of 16-bit (CD) datastream to an analogue signal without oversampling / filtering / general-messing-about, keeps things somehow 'intact'.
However the idea of an upscaler that takes this same signal and refines it by a factor of 16x does look appealing (if done well) and I would certainly be interested to hear what it can do.
Chord are not helping, what does "refines it by a factor of 16x" actually mean? Fundamentally all they can do is oversample and filter. The type of filter will matter, but its still a filter. Generally somewhere in the system there will be a reconstruction filter, either at the end of the DAC or in your speakers or somewhere between. Upsampleing means that filter have a higher frequency corner, but its still there. Upsampleing and then filtering in the digital domain is not a fundamental different operation to NOS and a output filter.
- Fretless
- Posts: 9328
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2014 12:15 pm
- Location: Somewhere in Holland
- Has thanked: 1514 times
- Been thanked: 2310 times
Re: Digital Upscaling
My lack of technical experience does show itself here. Just me saying what I have discovered first-hand and from the information available.
Still on that learning curve ....
Still on that learning curve ....
Upstairs:
VinylPro-Ject 1.2 + Grado Sig Jr + Cambridge Alva Duo
DigiVolumio PC + Kiss DP-500 + Sabaj A20d
NVA: Cube2 - SSP - LS6+ Sabaj A10a {x2)
Little Bear MC2 + AQ NightHawk
Downstairs:
VinylLogic DM101 + Syrinx LE1 + Grado Sig MCX
DigiDenafrips Ares II + Volumio PC + Cambridge CXC
NVA: P50 & PSU - BMUAiyima A07 MAX + Arcam One
HP: Allo DigiOne + Sabaj A10d + AQ NightOwl
Office: Allo DigiOne SIG + SMSL M300se + Douk G4 (x2)
Mission 760 + Monolith 887 + German Maestro GMP 450
-
- Posts: 4185
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:53 am
- Location: The end of the road in Suffolk Coastal.
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 6 times
Re: Digital Upscaling
There's a lot supposedly 'wrong' with NOS DAC's and the whole point of oversampling in the first place I gather, was to put the 'effects' of the filters as far away from the human-audio range as possible. I suspect the Mscaler is there 'because it can be' and to show what a clever bunny Rob Watts undoubtedly thinks he is (and probably is in real life as his Chord DAC designs are apparently technically about as good as it gets). What we 'hear' from such things is almost certainly the output stage and not really the digital part at all I reckon.
What recent reading up has shown is that many hi-res formats and DACs introduce shedloads of ultrasonic and rf muck into the chain which red-book CD all but eliminates and which may upset some amps and even tweeters, the best of the latter which extend to 40kHz and beyond. All this cleverness seems to have nowt to do with the music except for the fact that some music masters are 'remastered' with more care to make the hi-res format sound supposedly 'better.' Doing direct comparisons can be worse too as levels can vary (we/I usually prefer the very-slightly louder one in direct comparisons and this decision changes if the slightly louder one becomes the slightly quieter one).
That little DAC-For-A-Tenner (or less) really does show how far we've moved on and it appears that for musical sound quality, most DACs over a hundred quid are only really 'better' in academic, but not usually audible ways if you can't *see* what's being used, the rest going into the case and facilities in many cases. In fact, many mega-grand DAC confections costing several thousand quid or more are WORSE as the designers twiddle and fart around with the chipset with no real knowledge of what they're actually doing - apparently. Interesting comment I read yesterday about DCS - they reportedly used to do superb professional DACs at high but not stratospheric prices, but the great success of their insanely priced OTT domestic confections caused them to follow the huge profits available and abandon the pro market apparently... At the other end, earlier Schiit DACs really were in measurable terms, but apparently they've updated their test gear (needed in design of such tech) and things are turning round for them apparently.
What recent reading up has shown is that many hi-res formats and DACs introduce shedloads of ultrasonic and rf muck into the chain which red-book CD all but eliminates and which may upset some amps and even tweeters, the best of the latter which extend to 40kHz and beyond. All this cleverness seems to have nowt to do with the music except for the fact that some music masters are 'remastered' with more care to make the hi-res format sound supposedly 'better.' Doing direct comparisons can be worse too as levels can vary (we/I usually prefer the very-slightly louder one in direct comparisons and this decision changes if the slightly louder one becomes the slightly quieter one).
That little DAC-For-A-Tenner (or less) really does show how far we've moved on and it appears that for musical sound quality, most DACs over a hundred quid are only really 'better' in academic, but not usually audible ways if you can't *see* what's being used, the rest going into the case and facilities in many cases. In fact, many mega-grand DAC confections costing several thousand quid or more are WORSE as the designers twiddle and fart around with the chipset with no real knowledge of what they're actually doing - apparently. Interesting comment I read yesterday about DCS - they reportedly used to do superb professional DACs at high but not stratospheric prices, but the great success of their insanely priced OTT domestic confections caused them to follow the huge profits available and abandon the pro market apparently... At the other end, earlier Schiit DACs really were in measurable terms, but apparently they've updated their test gear (needed in design of such tech) and things are turning round for them apparently.
Hanging on in quiet desperation is the English way...The time has gone, The song is over, Thought I'd something more to say...
- Dr Bunsen Honeydew
- Posts: 30758
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 7:26 pm
- Location: Muppet Labs
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 48 times
Re: Digital Upscaling
I am highly suspicious of recently designed DACs and their RF performance, and I am sure some NVA amps have been damaged by them. It reminded me of the arseholes at the BBC back in the early 70's suddenly making speaker 10 times more complicated and blaming some of the amps around then for not coping with them - cart before horse - cart before horse !!!!!!!!!
EVERY TIME in music when you complicate things you make them worse musically and more difficult to accommodate - it is ludicrous and all for the sake of finding a bullshit to help YOU part with your money.
EVERY TIME in music when you complicate things you make them worse musically and more difficult to accommodate - it is ludicrous and all for the sake of finding a bullshit to help YOU part with your money.